Regulation & Policy
EU AI Act
Also known as: AI Act, European AI Act
The EU AI Act is European Union legislation that regulates artificial intelligence systems according to the risk they pose. It bans a small set of practices outright, places strict obligations on high risk uses, sets transparency duties for some systems and adds specific rules for general purpose AI models. Obligations apply in phases rather than all at once.
What it is
The AI Act is a horizontal regulation, meaning it applies across sectors rather than to one industry. It sorts AI uses into tiers: prohibited practices, high risk systems, systems with transparency obligations such as chatbots and synthetic media, and everything else with minimal duties. It also sets separate requirements for providers of general purpose AI models, including documentation and copyright related policies.
Why it matters
Marketing and discovery teams increasingly use AI for content generation, personalisation, lead scoring, targeting and customer support, so the rules touch everyday work. Transparency duties affect how AI generated content and AI assistants are labelled to users, which has direct implications for trust and brand safety. The Act also applies to organisations outside the EU whose AI systems or outputs are used in the EU, so it is not only a European compliance question.
How it works
Teams usually start with an inventory of every AI tool and use case, then classify each one against the Act's tiers to see which obligations bite. High risk uses require documentation, risk management, human oversight, data governance and record keeping, while lower risk uses mainly need clear disclosure and sensible internal policy. Most organisations handle this with a cross functional group covering legal, security, data and marketing, supported by vendor due diligence on the AI suppliers they rely on.
When it applies
It applies to providers, deployers, importers and distributors of AI systems where the system or its output is used in the EU, with duties phased in over several years from the Act's entry into force. Review your position whenever you adopt a new AI tool, change how an existing one is used, or use AI in decisions affecting people such as recruitment, credit or access to services.
Examples
- A retailer labels AI generated product descriptions and chatbot replies so customers know they are interacting with or reading AI output.
- An HR team reviews an AI CV screening tool and finds it falls into the high risk category, so it adds human review and formal documentation.
- A marketing team adds AI specific questions to its vendor assessment, asking suppliers for model documentation and details of training data policies.
How it is measured
- Share of AI use cases inventoried and risk classified against the Act's tiers
- Number of high risk systems with complete technical documentation and human oversight in place
- Percentage of AI vendors with signed terms covering AI Act responsibilities
- Completion rate for internal AI literacy and policy training
Related terms in Regulation & Policy
- AI complianceAI compliance is the work of making sure AI systems meet the laws, regulations, standards and internal policies that apply to them. It spans data protection, transparency, risk classification, documentation, human oversight and record keeping across the life of a system. In practice it combines legal interpretation, engineering controls and ongoing evidence gathering.
- AI governanceAI governance is the set of policies, roles, controls and review processes an organisation uses to manage how AI systems are built, bought and used. It covers risk assessment, documentation, human oversight, data handling and accountability. It applies both to AI a company develops and to third-party AI tools used by staff.
- AI privacyAI privacy is the set of practices, rights and obligations that govern how personal data is collected, used, stored and exposed when building or using AI systems. It covers training data, prompts and outputs, retention by AI vendors, and the transparency and control offered to the people whose data is involved. For marketing teams it shapes what customer data can safely be put into AI tools and what must be disclosed.
- AI safetyAI safety is the practice of designing, testing and operating AI systems so they cause less harm, behave predictably and resist misuse. It covers alignment with intended behaviour, evaluation and red teaming, content guardrails, and monitoring once a system is live. For marketers it shapes what models will say, how assistants handle brands, and what compliance teams expect before AI tools go into production.
- AI transparencyAI transparency is the practice of making clear how an AI system works, what sits behind it, and when content or an interaction involves AI. It covers regulatory disclosure duties as well as voluntary explanations such as model cards, labels on synthetic media and citations in AI generated answers. For publishers and marketers it sets expectations about when AI involvement should be declared and how clearly.
- Competition and Markets AuthorityThe Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is the United Kingdom's competition and consumer protection regulator. It investigates mergers, anti-competitive conduct and market practices, and it holds specific powers over large digital firms under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024. Its decisions shape how search engines, app stores and AI assistants operate in the UK market.